Excuse Me; Is This the Bus to Wonderland?

Uncle Volodya says, "It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.
”

Uncle Volodya says, “It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.
”

Welcome to Wonderland
My God it’s half past eight
Who cares if you came late
We don’t care where you’ve been
You’re gonna fit right in
A little fun detour
A little crazy, sure
Don’t get all insecure…

It’s afternoon all day
There’s lots of games to play
Flamingo lawn croquet
So please enjoy your stay

Everyday it’s something new
Problems up the old wazoo
Rumors of a palace coup…

From the Musical, “Wonderland

Perhaps I should mention at the outset, for anyone just joining us and for those who rather anticipated an outing, we are not actually going on a trip to Wonderland. Not exactly. What I meant was that we are going to visit the Hall of Amusements where Gideon Rachman – English crazyman and sometime analyst, please don’t get too close to the cage, little girl – goes when he writes. So, no need for sandwiches and lemonade, we’ll do that another time. Nonetheless, prepare to be amazed, and fascinated, in that vertiginous way you are when the car in which you are riding passes a bad car crash, or an arrest in which the subject is drunk and fancies himself a comedian, and the police slam him up against the wall repeatedly for his smart mouth. You’re afraid to look, lest you be drawn in yourself, but you can’t look away because you sense it is an important moment that may shape future beliefs. About something.

It’s tough, every post, to come up with descriptive words for the crazy things people say, because it is essentially the same story every time, just with different players. And Gideon Rachman is very crazy indeed, so much so that he may even believe the things he says are true. But they’re not. They’re a fantasy, playing out in a fantasy world where a space-helmeted Rachman is at the helm of the starship “Sanctions”, and you better believe it is kicking ass and taking names. In the mind of Gideon Rachman, it is only a matter of weeks, perhaps days, before Russia crumbles, unable to take any more because a hundred or so of its people are no longer allowed to travel to western countries, assets they had which are long since withdrawn are subject to freezing (a nice word for “stealing”) and so are any they might be so foolish as to place in future in banks of countries where they can’t travel, and because its banks have lost access to western capital lending markets.

Let’s put that last bit in perspective, before we go any further; Russia has reserves which will enable it to last for two years, without having to endure starvation and suffering or any old babushki losing their pensions, and without having to start appropriating private wealth. Life as normal, more or less. And that’s without doing anything – just sitting tight and waiting for the west to get over its pique. Does anyone think Russia is likely to do that? No, indeed; it is paying down its debt to the west rather than default, and taking steps to extricate itself – to the extent it is possible – from western financing links. Should Russia’s measured, deliberate and cautious decoupling from the west for some reason fall apart or prove impossible to maintain, behind Russia lies the massive wealth of its neighbour and growing ally – China. China has already taken a stand against the western sanctions, and warned that if Russia gets into financial trouble it can’t handle, China will step in. Yes, that was a warning, and the west would have been wise to heed it. But it had the bit of stupidity and self-love firmly in its teeth, and it only galloped on toward ruin.

Not to put the conclusion first or anything – we haven’t even looked at the article yet – but what would lead Gideon Rachman and the millions like him to accept these fantasies as a true picture of the state of affairs? Short answer, because he is a fucking idiot. And he is. But more than that, the faith of these people in the western banking and financial empire and the overall superiority of western goods is such a teflon barrier to reality that they are unable to conceive of a world in which other countries can do business and trade with one another without having to go through or partner with the west.

Let’s look at Rachman’s  latest pearl of journalistic wisdom (thanks to et Al for the link!). Don’t take my word for it, I want you to read the whole thing; but I believe you will conclude – as I did – that Rachman was so tickled with that line “a contest between the television and the refrigerator” that he decided to build a whole story around it, and it would not have made sense without a bucketful of bullshit mixed in.

That’s the whole pretext of this shallow and fantastic piece from a shallow and delusional author; that there is a war on for the mind of the average Russian, and it is between the propaganda he sees on the television – exhorting him to support the Dear Leader in the country’s dangerous game with the mighty west – and the barren wastes of his empty refrigerator telling him, repent! Repent, and rise up in your masses and demand that the leader turn aside from this mad course, and take instruction from the west on how to help it achieve its objectives. Obey, or be starved into submission, which is a concept – coming from an Englishman – that is so eye-opening that I was quite taken aback by it, and readers will want to remember it for the next time that poxy git who is the current British Prime Minister gets up in Parliament and runs his chip-hole about this or that dictator being the living embodiment of evil cruelty.

But the refrigerator lowers the spirits, with its increasingly sparse and costly contents“, crows Rachman triumphantly. Let’s just dispense with this canard right now – the ruble is taking a shitkicking on foreign exchange, because it is the target in a currency war designed to force it downward until it’s worthless and so create a panic among the population when they have to take a wheelbarrowload of them to buy a loaf of bread, like the hyperinflation of the Weimar Republic in the early 20’s.  Like the unfortunate Germans did, the west is trying to force Russia into a cycle of crazy inflation and printing more and more money. Which isn’t happening. The ruble still buys more or less the same in domestic products as it did before. If you buy your milk from the Pepsi Company like Alexey Navalny does, the price has achieved escape velocity; too bad for you. But suggesting that Russians are now cut off from reasonably-priced food, and soon their shrunken bellies will force them into the streets, is lunacy. Lunacy that assumes Russians don’t know where milk comes from if they can’t buy it from an American company, don’t know what the ingredients are for cheese, are too squeamish to butcher a pig, and run farms for chickens which lay pebbles instead of eggs.

Don’t take my word for it. Check. These are market prices for ordinary foodstuffs and domestic household products in Moscow. As you can see, some have even been reduced, and those that have not are by no means unaffordable. For example, a 2 kg bag of flour in the Moscow market costs 49.90 rubles. Let’s work the prices out to a third denomination – U.S. dollars. That bag of flour would cost the Muscovite 79 cents U.S. at today’s exchange rate. By way of contrast, a 1.25 kg bag of McDougall’s Plain Flour at Sainsbury’s London Bridge will set a British consumer back 1.40, or $2.15 in U.S. currency. Quite a difference. How about milk? In the Moscow market, same as the flour, 49.90 rubles for 950 ml; which is 79 cents U.S. At Sainsbury’s in London, 1 litre of whole milk goes for 1.15, which is $1.77 U.S.

But I think I see the problem. There are lots of sites like DailyFinance.com, which purport to tell interested people the price of common food staples around the world, and how much others have to pay in comparison with Americans. According to them, people in Los Angeles pay the highest for a litre of milk among Americans sampled: $2.49. But the poor bastards in Moscow are paying $3.89! I suppose they get that price fed to them by Pepsi Co. or some other American retailer in Russia. But ordinary Russians don’t buy their brand unless they want to show off how much money they have. And prices in country stores outside Moscow are lower yet.

So it’s probably misinformation like that which is making Rachman rub his hands together in anticipation of Russia coming around tomorrow, maybe next week, scuffing the dirt with the toe of its shoe and mumbling “Guess you can have your way in Ukraine; not much I can do about it”. Ha, ha!! Dream on, Gideon, you fucking crazy bug-eating, paint-chip-chewing berk!!

Get it, Rachman? The Russians are not starving. They’re not looking longingly at the refrigerator, hoping food will magically appear in it. You can’t get your end away with some tasty Russian girl for a pound of sausage, like you couldn’t with an English girl for an orange during the war, although some foreign servicemen liked to think so. There are no food shortages in Russia owing to sanctions by God-fearing Englishmen and Those Who Stand Shoulder To Shoulder With Them, and if you were not such a fucking chump chowderhead you would be able to look these things up for yourself. Oh, I forgot – you are an academic. You just know.

To be sure, there are profiteers – I wish I could say the Russians are different from every other people on the earth, and do not try to profit from the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune. But it’s not true. Some Moscow food stores have hiked prices by 130%. And what happens then? They’re reported to the Moscow Public Prosecutor, and an investigation is carried out. I don’t know what the penalty is which is imposed by the state, but the name of the store is published on a list of businesses being investigated, and I should think a word to the wise is as sufficient in Moscow as anywhere else – it is perhaps no coincidence that one of these stores is the only one in which prices overall have fallen lately. People have alternatives, and nobody needs to pay crazy prices if they do not want to. And once again, there are no shortages. Poland is not the only place in the world that apples will grow, and Russia rapidly shifted its procurement to countries which are not part of the sanctions regime. This has a very important knock-on consequence, down the road – Russia’s food-products countersanctions are only in place for a year, but that’s a century in retail and unless the west is prepared to offer unbelievable deals and assurances, those markets are gone forever. Because the west can’t be trusted, as it has been at great pains to establish.

There’s another reason Rachman’s cackling would be more appropriate at Bethlem Royal Hospital, and it is that he does not understand poll variables or how to establish cause and effect. He just throws a bunch of numbers out there and says, “There, you see. That proves it”. Proves what? For example, he cites recent results which suggest 44% of Russians now see Americans as enemies, from 4% before the conflict started. How that is a net positive in England is beyond my understanding. But, wait for it, though – only 19% now think that Ukraine should be part of Russia, compared with about 50% from last March!!!

Ummm….what do those polls have to do with one another? Is there any evidence, any evidence at all which suggests that if fewer Russians now believe “Ukraine” (presumably only the disputed area in the East of the country) should be part of Russia, it suggests a weakening of support for Putin’s position on the conflict? Far more likely fewer Russians want to get stuck with the enormous bill for rebuilding it, since the Ukrainian army has shelled it to bits. That’s certainly something to be proud of, isn’t it, old chap? Just because fewer Russians favour bringing Eastern Ukraine into the fold does not indicate that they wish for a western victory in the form of a Poroshenko triumph: what’s his approval rating in Russia?

But Gideon continues to chatter on blithely about supermarket food shortages – with absolutely no evidence except what his “friend in Moscow”, likely another expat, told him.

Mr. Rachman believes the economy is Russia’s weakness, its soft underbelly. And that continued tightening of sanctions and efforts to hurt the Russian economy are the best course to achieve the desired result – a Russian capitulation. Since that is a relatively harmless belief (to Russia), let us hope he continues to believe it.

Editor’s note: I originally – and incorrectly – attributed the subject article to Edward Lucas, and I must confess I did not notice any glaring indications from the author’s stated beliefs which would suggest it was not he. Nevertheless, I humbly apologize to Mr. Lucas for attributing to him idiocies that there is no proof – on this occasion – he believes, and statements he did not make.

This entry was posted in Corruption, Economy, Europe, Government, Investment, Politics, Russia, Strategy, Trade, Ukraine, Vladimir Putin and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2,531 Responses to Excuse Me; Is This the Bus to Wonderland?

  1. Jen says:

    Me first! Me first!

    I believe Russia uses its own version of the Consumer Price Index which is based on the prices of a standard range of goods and services that most families would buy. It would be interesting to know how accurate the Russian CPI is.
    http://www.global-rates.com/economic-indicators/inflation/consumer-prices/cpi/russia.aspx

    Also Bethlem Royal Hospital might be too good for Ed Lucas (unless Mark is thinking of the abuse of mental patients there). Arkham Asylum might be a better place.

    Thanks for a great article again!

    • marknesop says:

      Thanks, Jen! As you will have noticed by now, the article was not by Edward Lucas; I saw the heading “FT in Lucasland” and assumed it was him, and though I read the whole article I cannot say there was anything in it which shouted “This is not Edward Lucas” because it sweats groupthink and could as easily have been written by Lucas, or Shaun Walker or any of the Guardian or Telegraph stable. It’s fixed now, and the true author sounds enough like Edward Lucas that it still fits like a bespoke suit, although poor Mr. Lucas was unjustly maligned.

      • Jen says:

        Oh yes, thanks, I’ve seen your amendment.

        Though there’s the fact that Ed Lucas suggested that Russia confused the decision-making abilities of Ukraine so much so (eh?) that it won a war in Crimea without a shot being fired (eh?) last March; that RT.com hires Holocaust deniers, 9/11 conspiracy theory nutcases and people who believe the Pope is a lizard; and that news outlets like RT.com and Sputnik should be subjected to “ostracism”, all with his tongue away from both cheeks – that’s enough proof to consider him certified.
        http://www.stopfake.org/en/edward-lucas-who-is-ready-for-hybrid-warfare/

  2. Warren says:

    A Silly Blunder or Back to the Future? CNN Annexes Ukraine to Russia

    Read more: http://sputniknews.com/world/20150218/1018414868.html#ixzz3S5TGbRxs

  3. Warren says:

    Daily Telegraph’s Peter Oborne urges HSBC coverage review

    The chief political commentator of the Daily Telegraph has called for an independent review of the newspaper’s guidelines over its coverage of the HSBC tax scandal.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31517545

    Swiss police raid HSBC’s Geneva office

    Swiss police are searching offices of the Geneva subsidiary of HSBC bank in an inquiry into alleged money-laundering.

    Prosecutors said they are investigating HSBC Private Bank (Suisse) and persons unknown for suspected aggravated money laundering.

    The investigation could be extended to people suspected of committing or participating in money laundering.

    It follows the recent published revelations about the private bank

    The bank’s chief executive, Franco Morra, said last week it had shut down accounts from clients who “did not meet our high standards”.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-31516416

  4. Wonder what happened (or will happen) to the Kiev troops in Debaltsevo pocket. Some posters in the MP.net are saying that they are being let go (with their weapons) instead of being captured.

  5. peter says:

    Let’s look at Edward “Peyote” Lucas’s latest pearl of journalistic wisdom…

    Err, the article in question is not written by Lucas.

  6. et Al says:

    It’s a bit my fault. I wrote ‘FT in Lucasland’ by which I meant that the FT was in the same kind of fantasy land that Ed Lucas has created in side his head.

    The article (no longer accessible – at least to me) is of course by Gideon Rachmann.

    The Bout Opening – Stick to Checkers, America. Not Up In Here.

    • et Al says:

      That said, everything besides the name of the author is spot on. Our very own long term Moscow resident, Moscow Exile, has provided us directly with actual shop prices for normal products and this shows how the Pork Pie News Network fixates or cherry picks one item – the rapid rise in price of a few food items – totally out of context.

      They call it (no doubt) ‘making a point’, I call it bullshit that wouldn’t even pass a basic test of journalism, but we all know that the PPNN simply don’t give a fk about presenting anything even remotely balanced, let alone explaining important nuances.

      All I wish is that they all go bankrupt and new, serious, news agencies take their place and use facts in their proper context, and not just have to rely on the growing alternative media. The BBC is the biggest joke of them all, they are experts in delivering the perception of news – preening like a peacock if you will. Aunty needs to be sent off to a retirement village where it can join the likes of much of the western press…

    • marknesop says:

      Dear Lord – you’re right. I have defamed Edward Lucas unfairly. I shall have to go back and fix it. I did not even look because the name Lucas is as a red rag to a bull. But he sounds enough like Lucas that it will still work.

    • marknesop says:

      That’s pretty funny, and one hell of a case of projection. The west imposes sanctions on Russia for something it didn’t do, and then any reaction other than adopting the fetal position is “making war on the west”.

  7. PaulR says:

    And on a different subject, the following tweet by the Independent’s Ollie Carroll amused me: ‘Returning soldiers message: “Putin is a dick and Poroshenko is his used condom”.’ https://twitter.com/olliecarroll/status/568006163104702464

  8. Moscow Exile says:

    We know where to buy cheaper

    Translation: sample basket; first shop “Magnet” prices:

    What grocery store in Moscow offers minimal rates?

    It’s no secret that buying food is a major item of expenditure for the average Russian family. According to statistics, an average of 80% of the budget is spent by families buying food. In Moscow there a lot of different hypermarkets, which offer products at low prices. As part of the survey, I tried to find grocery stores that offer the lowest food prices. The first thing I focused on was grocery store chains.

    In order to determine who was the leader in this survey, the prices of the following products were compared:

    1. Milk “Little House in a Village” sterilized, 3.2% fat), 0,95 l
    2. Curd “Miracle” with the taste of cherries, 4.2% fat, 100 g
    3. Chocolate Alpen Gold (“Alpen gold”) milk chocolate with hazelnut 90 g
    4. Nescafe Gold (Nescafe gold) freeze-dried 190 g
    5. Cheese “Russian” 50% 1 kg
    6. Sunflower oil “Golden seed” refined 1.0 l
    7. Apples Golden 1 kg
    8. Tea Greenfield (Greenfield) Jasmine dream green HAK cards/pack
    9. Juice “I” Apple pulp 0,97 l
    10. Prunes “Gifts of nature” dried pitted 150 g
    11. Drinking water Bon Aqua (Bon Aqua) soda 2.0L square bottle

    1st Place “Magnet”

    The deli “Magnet” that I visited is located near the metro station Rechnoy Vokzal. As things turned out in the survey, the lowest price food was here. The range is largely similar to those at the “Pyaterochka” supermarkets and is dominated by economy class products of. All types of food products are offered. I love this shop: the prices here are low, and the quality of the goods is really. However, several times I have been in shops where everything was not so rosy. In some stores, the level of cleanliness in the sales area left much to be desired, but unlike some online grocery stores here, I have never come across products with an expired shelf life. I think it is quite justified to put these shops in the first place of the ranking.

    1. Milk “Little House in a Village” sterilized, 3.2% fat), 0,95 l – 39 rubles 90 kopecks
    2. Curd “Miracle” with the taste of cherries, 4.2% fat, 100 g – 19 rubles 90 kopecks
    3. Chocolate Alpen Gold (“Alpen gold”) milk chocolate with hazelnut 90 g – 32 rubles 90 kopecks
    4. Nescafe Gold (Nescafe gold) freeze-dried 190 g – 321 RUB
    5. Cheese “Russian” 50% 1 kg – 339 rubles 90 kopecks
    6. Sunflower oil “Golden seed” refined 1.0 l – 55 rubles 90 kopecks
    7. Apples Golden 1 kg – 57 rubles
    8. Tea Greenfield (Greenfield) Jasmine dream green HAK cards/pack – 251 rubles
    9. Juice “I” Apple pulp 0,97 l – 44 rubles 90 kopecks
    10. Prunes “Gifts of nature” dried pitted 150 g – 79 rubles 90 kopecks
    11. Drinking water Bon Aqua (Bon Aqua) soda 2.0L square bottle – 26 rubles 90 kopecks

    End of translation

    And the list of rankings goes on.

    You can see the prices at other retail outlets: no need to translate any further.

    Now don’t forget folks! – Famine will soon stalk the Empire of Evil, thanks to Uncle Sam and the EU arseholes, and the starving masses will arise and overthrow the Dark Lord and become willing subjects of the Great Hegemon.

    Talking of arseholes, perhaps that arsehole Gideon Rachmannof FT and his Moscow friend would like to comment on these prices?

    I can’t be arsed posting this information to Rachmann though: it would be a total waste of time giving facts to a propagandist.

    Interesting name Rachmann.

    Wonder if he’s related?

    • kat kan says:

      ” According to statistics, an average of 80% of the budget is spent by families buying food. ”
      this would indicate phenomenally low housing costs. Why does nobody mention the almost-free housing then?

      Chocolate, prunes and water are essential food items? nobody eats bread or meat anymore?

      • patient observer says:

        I noticed that as well – housing, transportation, utilities, medical care, education, R&R, etc. all covered by 20% of the family budget. What a country!

        • marknesop says:

          I’m pretty sure portrayal of the country as a model of social progress was not the intent. I am similarly pretty sure that suggesting the family is struggling to feed itself in Russia was the intent.

      • colliemum says:

        “Chocolate, prunes and water are essential food items? nobody eats bread or meat anymore?”
        But of course!
        Bread and meat are really really bad for your health, whereas choccies are very good indeed, as are prunes, to help with the side effect of chocolate on the, ahem, evacuation of digested material in the guts, a.k.a. ‘de-toxifying’.
        And water is of course the only drink one can have with a good conscience – everything else means one will die …

        You gotta peruse the fad diet pages of the MSM more diligently, kat kan!
        😉

      • Moscow Exile says:

        Yes, it may come as a surprise to many, I’m sure, but Russians do eat meat.

        I bought a kilo of beef 2 days ago for a little more than 400 rubles.

        Yes, Russians do eat bread as well.

        I bought a loaf of white wheat bread for 24 RR. also bought a loaf of black rye bread for 23 RR.

        No, in general, Russians do not eat fast food, microwave products, stuff in cans.

        Russians eat fresh fruit and vegetables.

        Which fruit and vegetables they eat depends on the season, although bananas are always plentiful. In August/September Moscow is inundated with water and honey melons from the south.

        Russian women, in my experience, spend far longer in the kitchen preparing meals than do Western European women. They spend a lot of time washing, cutting, chopping, dicing vegetables in the kitchen. They also make soup most days – shchi (cabbage) or borshch being the most popular.

        Russian women that I know and who have visited or lived and worked in the USA tell me that they think food in the USA is rather strange and not really appetizing and most certainly unhealthy.

        Meat in Mosow

        How much does meat cost?

        Meat in Moscow

        Bread

        Picture above: special offer at Pyatyorochka

        See: Хлеб белый, Красная цена, 380 г

  9. james says:

    i’m not reading it.. too much lying and bullshit to wade thru.. i see too much of it already, and even if it is well written the lying gets to me. they have a job to do dispensing propaganda to unsuspecting minds, but i have other things to do.. thanks for the post mark and your passion to stay focused on what is a more accurate portrayal of what is going on here.

  10. colliemum says:

    That stupid image of TV versus empty fridge used by Gideon R. is based on something which might have penetrated into his comfy London metro-elite life. Of course, he thwarted it to make it funny ha-ha, in order to use it to smear the evil Empire, or rather its poor people.
    This thwarted image is based on the brutal reality of many pensioners literally having to decide between buying food or keeping one room reasonably warm during winter – thanks to the meagre state pension on the one hand and the exorbitant energy prices, thus heating costs, on the other.
    It seems odd that he and the rest of the hacks are so obsessed with food prices in Moscow – perhaps they could find out what the cost of heating a room or two is, for normal Muscovites? Wouldn’t take make a nice comparison? Or would that be too shameful for the nations blessed with the power to impose sanctions on Russia?

  11. peter says:

  12. ThatJ says:

    Ukrainian Channel 112 has just also received a warning and says they might disappear at any moment for showing 2 minutes of a pro-Russian guy talking on a 3.5 hour program of Shuster Live on February 13.

    http://112.ua/novosti-kanala/112-ukraina-poluchil-preduprezhdenie-za-translyaciyu-shuster-live-nuzhna-li-na-ukrainskom-televidenii-programma-shuster-live-192139.html

    Glory to European Values and freedom of the press!

    And it’s not the only Freedom™ news from today, Savic Shuster’s live show (the most popular political talk show in the Ukraine) has been banned. Again. Now from the 24th channel.
    And a comment from Lyashko (!) : “Even with Yanukovich we had more freedom of speech than we have with Poroshenko

    I’m giggling like an idiot right now. Of all people it was him saying this. That fear-mongering maniac and populist who abused any human liberty possible during his Donbass adventures. Speaks volumes.

    (source: mp.net)

    Steshin, KP reporter:
    “I do not understand excitement about Debaltsevo. Really decisive fight will be in Olkhovatka.”

    Poroshenko just promised that everyone who exited Debaltsevo will be rotated.

    Think about what that means: There are several thousand Ukrainian soldiers who were in Debaltsevo (many of them representing the minority of combat-capable/experienced forces), who are now out of the loop. Combine this with the scheduled demobilization in March, the failed 4th wave of mobilization, and I hope you get the picture of what Ukraine’s capabilities are now (and no, “western superweapons” aren’t going to change that reality in any way shape or form).

    Anyone still think Ukraine is going to “retaliate” somehow by launching an offensive operation on something as its Minister of Interior has said? And by the way, no, I don’t think seps/Russia will take advantage of this to grab more territory. Because that’s exactly the point that Putin has been making very consistently (for example in Ilovaisk with not advancing on Mariupol) – that Russia simply wants Kiev to pull out troops and accept a frozen conflict, which is the only thing it’ll get, regardless of what it (or the west) does. Kiev has simply been stubborn. Time to face the music and accept reality now. The more Kiev resists, the more it hurts itself. Call that “appeasement” – or just accept it for what it is.

    (source: mp.net)

    Nudelman’s Gulag: Chief Police officer Yuriy Gladik stated that more than 700 separatists have been detained in Kharkiv.

    [ThatJ: If that’s really him, expect a PR coup by Russia. As another Twitter user said, “when he spills the beans on where he got his training for maidan {poland btw} @eucopresident will be totes embarrassed”.]

    From NAF source: on one block (200m) in Debaltsevo I could count 130 bodies of UAF soldiers and 17 of NAF

    http://twitter.com/JasonElander/status/568127916711780352

    [ThatJ: We shall see. I’m not overconfident either. Guess what will happen if the junta launches another offensive in 1-2 months? The US will blame Russia and the EU will impose sanctions. Will Russia and the rebels after defeating the junta loyalists once again ask for another “peace deal” if this happens?]

  13. Moscow Exile says:

    Porky’s calling for EU “peace keepers” in the Ukraine.

  14. ThatJ says:

    My take on it: Poroshenko is acting on the orders of the US, the rationale is that rebels won’t be able to fight because there will be peacekeepers present in the country, whose deaths will really, really escalate the situation, probably leading to a massive deployment of NATO troops in order to “secure the safety of the peacekeepers” (a false flag attack springs to mind). With foreign troops present in their areas, the rebels will be unable to act. Kiev, in turn, will renege on its words on federalization/autonomy and will eventually apply for NATO and EU membership. And in this world without rules that the Zionists have created, they may get away with it.

    To make matters worse, Poroshenko wants a EU-led peacekeeping mission: http://rt.com/news/233579-poroshenko-peacekeepers-ukraine-eu/

    • ThatJ says:

      In short: with foreign troops present in Eastern Ukraine, Russia will be unable to escalate the situation in case Ukraine submits an application to join NATO and the EU. If Russia or the rebels escalate (a simple false flag will accomplish the same outcome), a casus belli will ensure a massive deployment of foreign troops, as I explained above.

      • Moscow Exile says:

        In what way do you think Russia should wish to escalate the situation?

        Are you suggesting that the separatists wish to venture outside of the territory that they control, namely most of the Donbass and Lugansk provinces, and to launch an attack on Kiev, Lvov, Dnepropetrovsk, Ivano-Frankivsk etc,?

      • ThatJ says:

        @Moscow Exile

        NATO and the EU cannot accept countries embroiled in civil wars.

        With peacekeepers, this problem will be solved and the door for NATO and EU membership will be opened. Denying that Russia has been involved with the rebels in hope of maintaining the country neutral is silly. With peacekeepers, the door for escalation will be shut, or else more foreign troops will be employed to make sure there’s “peace” (in other words, they will serve as Kiev’s army, a situation that resembles the Balkans). NATO by backdoor.

      • marknesop says:

        NATO cannot accept members with unresolved border disputes. That matter must be concluded first. Therefore Ukraine would have to accept that Crimea and the East are lost to it, and recognize their independence. Then the remaining rump state could join both NATO and the EU if they would have it. Or continue trying to decide the matter by military force. But the EU would be taking in a country with no visible means of support and which had just lost a third of its tax base, while NATO would be accepting a partner which would have it in an Article 5 war with Russia in less time than it takes to turn around.

        • ThatJ says:

          I am aware that NATO doesn’t accept countries with border disputes. But I have watched too many legal violations by the US, & I’ve seen the US impose its will on Europe too often, so excuse me if I sound pessimistic.

        • et Al says:

          NATO cannot accept members with unresolved border disputes. That matter must be concluded first.

          What about the Estonian border with Russia? Agreement made, only ratified last year by the Estonian government? And Croatia, who claim the whole Prevlaka Peninsula including the Montenegrin part? Or Slovenia v. Croatia over the Piran Bay?

          It’s clear that NATO has a very elastic definition of borders. In that sense it is just like the EU. They have their rules, and as it is their rules, they see fit to break, ignore bend them as they see fit.

          • marknesop says:

            That’s a good point; however, I wonder if the issue of border disputes was raised in the text of their application for acceptance into NATO? According to sources on the subject, “In general, the official government policy of Latvia and Estonia is not to push the issue, but the territories’ return is supported by some, usually marginal, organizations inside these countries, such as the Abrenian Union in Latvia”. Is it not possible the disagreement over the border delineations was soft-pedaled so as to pass the test for admittance?

            In Georgia’s case it could not be denied, because Saakashvili rode to triumphant victory on a promise – among many others – to bring South Ossetia and Abkhazia back under Georgian control, and he appointed a Minister for Reunification whose central job was to come up with policies for luring the two wayward Republics back into the fold.

            Ukraine could easily duplicate the feat of the Baltics, as I have pointed out before – all the Ukrainian government would need to do would be to recognize the new status of Crimea and the eastern regions. It would catch the Russians on the back foot, for sure, because they would never expect it. Announce the decision first thing in the morning, and then table a request to join NATO by suppertime. In reality it would not happen that fast, but I think it would still be a tremendous surprise. It’s not like I am a brilliant strategist or anything, and I imagine any number of people have already thought of it. But the west probably wants it all, not a needy rump state with no visible means of support, stony broke and in direct conflict with the nuclear power next door, and with a parliament seasoned with Nazis.

      • kat kan says:

        They can’t get into EU and NATO before the end of 2015. But by then they are meant to change the constitution… or they break the Minsk agreement. Then what?

    • ThatJ says:

      The Ukrainian president also asked the council to rubberstamp planned “international military training exercises”.

      Porky spilling the beans again. He doesn’t need to make the Zionists’ plan this clear!

      Remember 2008?

    • marknesop says:

      Poroshenko has lost control of what is known as “battle rhythm”; a pre-planned series of events executed in compliance with a plan which was made to allow for all possible known eventualities. He is now 100% reactive and unable to impose his own decision-making on the course of events, and likewise unable to arrest or change their progress. He and the Ukrainian state are now merely riders on the tiger they have unleashed. But he also has to worry about a second front opening closer to home, as Yarosh and his pals in the fascist battalions take out their fury on him for being incapable of delivering the promised victory – how did that Ukrainian Victory Day parade in Crimea go? I must have missed it. The population of rump Ukraine must also be beginning to realize they have been lied to from the word “Go”, and that only ruin yawns ahead for them rather than a march through gilded streets to a place at the EU table.

      • Pavlo Svolochenko says:

        Are you positively sure Poroshenko isn’t working for Moscow? If he isn’t, he should be. He’s going to be condemned and ruined as if he were – he should at least try to get rewarded for being one.

        And could an actual Russian agent in his position have done any better?

        • cartman says:

          He’s ruined? It seems that he’s been stuffing his pockets, and is now richer than ever, despite the country’s economic collapse.

          • Pavlo Svolochenko says:

            Not ruined yet, but it’s likely once the Americans decide he’s the reason that Ukraine isn’t winning.

          • Moscow Exile says:

            It was studiously ignored,it seems, by the Western MSM that his Kiev Roshen profit was reported last week to have increased by ninefold in 2014.

            Poroshenko’s “Roshen” factory in Kyiv net profits rise by 9 times in 2014

            • Moscow Exile says:

              That should have been above: “was reported last week to have increased ninefold in 2014”.

              Clearly the Ukropy are so overjoyed with their success in their struggle for “freedom and democracy” and for their right to chose their own destiny without any interference whatsoever from the evil Moskali, which success has resulted in their being allowed to become an “associate member of the EU” and therefore, they believe, eventually full members of that wondrous organization, that they have been on a chocolate eating binge since last spring, the collapse of the Ukrainian economy, the soaring of inflation, the slump in the value of their real earnings, the military reversals in the East and the loss of the Crimea notwithstanding.

              There’s neowt as queer as folk!

              • ThatJ says:

                Glory to the Heroes!

              • marknesop says:

                I should not be surprised to learn that a lot of it is also being purchased, as a sign of patriotism, by the Ukrainian diaspora in Canada and the USA. Nearly every time we visit our Ukrainian friends, Roshen chocolates are handed ’round. They’re quite good, too. Probably a lot of it is brought in – in that particular instance – by their parents, who alternate six-month visits; now her parents, then his parents.

                • cartman says:

                  You should remind them that it was founded by Russians, who were dispossessed by the Bolsheviks. It was later bought by Porko with money he made by selling teenage prostitutes.

                • Moscow Exile says:

                  “Red October” chocolate is better, tovarishch!

                  They’ve moved the factory now, but it was smack bang in the city centre. I once told my kids that Willy Wonka’s factory was in Moscow and the didn’t believe me, of course. So I took them there. The whole area smells of chocolate as, I presume, it bubbles away in vats. My children were suitably impressed.

              • ThatJ says:

                Have you ever asked their views about Russia and Putin? I think that for the sake of friendship, these questions are better left unasked.

                But here’s an idea. You can give them the url of your blog. Or better yet, tell them you have a blog and that it can be found by googling “The Kremlin Stooge”. Priceless!

                • Moscow Exile says:

                  He could present his Roshen munching guests with one of these:

                  За Путина!

                • Moscow Exile says:

                  I’m going to get one tomorrow because in the morning I’ shall be working near a kiosk where they sell them. I want one that says on it: Наш Крым! [Our Crimea!].

                  Ironically, the kiosk is situated in an underpass that runs beneath Lubyanka Square and leads to the Lubyanka metro station. Tomorrow morning I shall be in an office right facing the Lubyanka building.

                  No worries though! I’m as sound as a pound with those blokes that work there because Mrs. Exile’s daft uncle had them check me out when he found out that she intended to marry me and they told him that I was kosher – which just shows you what a shower of incompetents they must be.

                • marknesop says:

                  We began to talk politics just once, and it was while the Maidan was still going on. There are two families, both from West Ukraine, and we frequently get together as a group. They were of the opinion that the crowd on the Maidan had to be a million. I pointed out that the square will only hold about 60,000 comfortably, and they insisted the rest were in sidestreets. I was cautious, but it became clear they intensely dislike Russia, although the group we get together with often includes Russians and the Ukrainians can obviously speak it fluently. The women are less politically-inclined than the men, and both seem to regard expats of either country to be a sort of stateless class that it is permissible to be friendly with. They’re nice people, and I genuinely like them and value their friendship. So we don’t talk politics.

            • marknesop says:

              I thought it was by 9%.

        • marknesop says:

          I find it hard to picture a man who comes across as so unimaginatively stupid (although he might be a talented orator in his native Ukrainian, I couldn’t say, as I don’t speak it) could be such a talented actor as to be actively or even unknowingly working for Russia while constantly reviling and spitting on Russia. He’s just not that good an actor, I don’t think. But you may be right – he certainly is playing into Moscow’s hands, now vaulting into office in an election in which about 20% of the electorate did not vote, now blowing off reasonable offers for a conditional peace in favour of unconditional war, now fucking it up so that the army loses, all the while keeping up a chorus of spoiled entitlement that turns off potential donors.

    • Jen says:

      Is Poroshenko allowed to ask for EU peacekeepers or an EU-led peacekeeping mission from the UN? The EU is hardly an impartial third party. The rebels would have to accept a UN peacekeeping mission as well. Plus Poroshenko can’t expect to use UN peacekeepers as a replacement army which I think is why he wants a UN peacekeeping mission led by the EU (hint: Poland, Lithuania).

      “… UN Peacekeeping is guided by three basic principles:
      1/ Consent of the parties;
      2/ Impartiality;
      3/ Non-use of force except in self-defence and defence of the mandate …”
      http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/operations/peacekeeping.shtml

    • james says:

      hasn’t the eu already taken enough of one side? lol.. if they want to look completely attached to a particular outcome – the wrong one – let them follow this path..

    • spartacus says:

      Well, from what information I have, the shortages in Venezuela are created artificially. The mechanism is something like this: the state sells oil for dollars. It then takes some of these dollars and sells them at a discounted lower rate to the companies that import various goods. The idea behind this is that the importers will then sell the goods on the Venezuelan market at a lower, affordable price. This is where things break down. The importers take those goods and, instead of selling them thorough legal outlets, they sell them on the black market or they move them through contraband in neighbouring Columbia, where they can sell them for more money. The thirst for profit is the prime mover of Capitalism and as long as you retain capitalist elements in your economy, you must expect that businessmen will not do what is moral, but what is profitable. Venezuela needs is to step up the class war. It needs to nationalize the businesses that handle the import activities or it needs to set up its own state owned company or companies to handle them. It needs to reduce its dependence on oil exports. It needs to build and expand its own manufacturing base. So far, all the Bolivarian Revolution managed to do is to use some of Venezuela’s surplus from selling oil to make some improvements in the life of its people (housing, healthcare, education). This is all very nice and necessary, but more is needed.

      I think the piece below gives a decent overview of the current economic war:

      http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/01/27/revolution-counter-revolution-and-the-economic-war-in-venezuela/

      • davidt says:

        Hi Spartacus. The Greek finance minister, Yanis Varoufakis, has written an article “How I became an erratic Marxist” that will probably interest you. (In so far that I understood it, I was sympathetic to his general points.)
        http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article41037.htm

        • Moscow Exile says:

          I knew a girl once who was an erotic Marxist.

          • davidt says:

            Why am I not surprised? No doubt you discovered that she was a Marxist first.

            • Moscow Exile says:

              Mais certainement, mon brave!

              Do you think I would have attempted to get my leg over with a capitalist?

              🙂

              • Moscow Exile says:

                As it happens, she was a German with whom I lived in sin when in the Vaterland; Rosa Luxemburg was her heroine. Apparently, “Red Rosa” believed that personal happiness and the struggle for social justice were not mutually exclusive and that if people gave up sex and art while making the revolution, then they would produce a world more heartless than the one they were setting out to replace.

                Anyway, I’m bloody glad my former rotes Mädchen didn’t choose Krupskaya as her role model:

                although I must say Lenin’s missus looked quite pretty in the 1890s.

                Mention of Krupskaya reminds me of the first funny (and also extremely vulgar) Soviet gag I heard here. Trouble is, it’s untranslatable because its wit turns on a pun:

                Крупская: Вова! Что ты пишешь?

                Ленин: Мандаты!

                Крупская: Сам ты хуй!

                Krupskaya: Vova! What are you writing?

                Lenin: Mandates!

                Krupskaya: You’re a prick yourself!

                Explanation: мандаты [mandaty] means “mandates”, whereas манда – ты [manda ty] means “You’re a c*nt!”]

                • marknesop says:

                  Krupskaya is almost a dead ringer for our friend Yulia, from Vladivostok. Yulia is a lot happier-looking, though; otherwise, they could be twins.

                • Moscow Exile says:

                  She looks like my elder daughter as well: full lips, blue eyes.Yelena Denisovna is, however, a blonde.

                  Krupskaya’s also has what I call a typically Russian “potato nose”. All my offspring have such a conk.

                  I blame their Tatar-Mongol-Finno-Ugric mother.

                  The pale skin, blue eyes and fair hair are, of course, from my Aryan genes.

                  Waes hael!

                  🙂

    • james says:

      i thought you were sharing a pic of a russian grocery store and an example of an empty refrigerator!!! pass the pic over to your friend from FT!!! he could use it for more propaganda purposes!!

      • Moscow Exile says:

        Russian grocer’s shop:

        Gastronom №1 in the USSR, situated at 14 Tverskaya St, now Yeliseyevsky’s once again. (The manager of this place, Yuri K. Sokolov, was executed by firing squad in 1984 after his having been found guilty of corrupt practices for years.)

        “Ashan” near where I live (French company Auchan) and where we occasionally go for a big shopping spree:

        Small Pyatyorochka local supermarket, Moscow:

        They don’t have point-of-sale cigarette sales now – not for a long time: illegal. Just shows you what kind of an oppressive state Russia is!

        • james says:

          that is a pretty swank place!!! they could hold classical concerts while shopping for groceries!!!

          • Moscow Exile says:

            It’s really weird inside, but it’s regular shop: there’s a lot of delicatessen there, but you can buy regular stuff as well. I often pop in because I work at a place nearby and the metro station is close to the shop on Pushkin Square.

            See what I mean: that’s an ornate tea display with Chinese motifs on the right, but on the left is a regular fruit and vegetable section.

            More pictures from a Chinese site:

            Bakery dept:

            Deli in the middle:

            New Year:

            It’s a funny old place.

            I usually call in there to get a big jar of Nutella, an Italian made hazelnut and chocolate spread, for my elder daughter, who, unfortunately has developed a dependency on it.

            The Italians must still be pals with the Russians, because it’s still available here.

  15. et Al says:

    Mark, your original piece fingering Lucas is up on Russia Insider! Better get it updated sharpish.

  16. Warren says:

    Published on 18 Feb 2015
    s the West and Russia face off over Ukraine, it is fair to ask whether this conflict represents a much larger struggle. Are we actually witnessing the Third World War being played out? If this is in fact true, what kind of war is it and who is winning?

    CrossTalking with George Szamuely, John Laughland, and Graham Allison.

  17. ThatJ says:

    Ukrainian prime minister promises to add missing link to the “Wall” on Russian border

    Those who are against the development of the border infrastructure and ensuring the line of security will be offered a one-way ticket to the other side of the state border, PM Arseniy Yatsenyuk says

    KIEV, February 18. /TASS/. The Ukrainian government has been planning to carry through a project that the Ukrainian side named the “European Wall”, Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk declared at a meeting of the Ukrainian Cabinet on Wednesday.

    “The border infrastructure is being built, and it will have been built. All those who are against the development of the border infrastructure and ensuring the line of security will be offered a one-way ticket to the other side of the state border. This applies to the pro-Russian political forces who have raised their heads in the parliament, the pro-Russian and anti-Ukrainian forces who are attempting to create havoc in the country,” Yatsenyuk said.

    Full text: http://tass.ru/en/world/778513

    • Jen says:

      “Missing link” – where will Yatseniuk find a mammoth-fighting Banderite?

    • james says:

      maybe PM Arseniy Yatsenyuk gets his walking orders from israel more then the usa? looks like it here..

    • marknesop says:

      Get the message, you pro-Russian mouthpieces in parliament? This is a one-party state, and what the dictator says goes. Nuland certainly could not have chosen better, because when he drags his whole country down with him, they will blame him instead of her for picking him in the first place.

  18. ThatJ says:

    “If Kiev violates the agreement, Russia may refuse to recognize Ukraine’s territorial integrity”—Vyacheslav Nikonov

    If Kiev violates Minsk-2, Russia will consider itself freed from the obligation to recognize Ukraine’s territorial integrity. During a plenary meeting of the State Duma on February 17, the United Russia Party deputy Vyacheslav Nikonov noted that the Minsk-2 agreement is a chance for peace in Ukraine, and a chance for Ukraine to exist as a state.

    “If they don’t want to take advantage of it, it will be only their fault. If the agreement is violated, Russia can also consider itself free from its provisions, which include the recognition of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, so I would not advise Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, Turchinov, and company to take this matter lightly.”

    http://fortruss.blogspot.com/2015/02/if-kiev-violates-agreement-russia-may.html

    Global Politics – a war of meanings

    In the course of life today, we’ve grown accustomed to using terms whose meaning we might not fully understand. We throw them around casually, not realizing that they lose their meaning and sometimes even come around to stand for their exact opposite. This is precisely why the sense has arisen today in society that there is a need to determine in a clear and understandable manner exactly what is happening on the global chessboard in front of all of our eyes – the Big Story, written online.

    http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2015/02/global-politics-war-of-meanings.html

    ThatJ: Saker reader “вот так” left this comment:

    I like how Starikov refers to the ISIS terrorists as US assets. I assume the Russian leadership has long known that “al qaida” never stopped being a ZPC/NWO owned and run tool. One sees more and more exposure of this in Russian media and by Russian government associated people.

    While I agree with much of what Starikov has written, I noticed several inconsistencies in the piece. the main one being this.

    Starikov describes the western economic system’s parasitism and its constant need for victims. He portrays the “Great Game” as being driven by this extra-national alliance of a predatory, monopolistic capitalist quest to control the world, essentially. But then proceeds to reduce this to country vs country, forgetting what he just wrote about the extra-national aspect of the forces aligned against Russia.

    The western oligarchy aligned against Russia (Eurasia, really) are not national, but extra-national. They use nations the same way they use their subsidiaries. This is why I use terms like ZPC/NWO (zionist power configuration/new world order). They operate out of European countries and the USA without regard to national interests for the most part. This is why leaders of these countries (essentially ZPC/NWO hirelings) most often act against the real interests of their own countries.

    There is one exception, that of Israel. The ZPC part of the oligarchy. While these oligarchs feel no loyalty to the countries they live in (those outside Israel), like the majority of the NWO oligarchs, they are loyal to the zionist ideology and Israel does garner their loyalty. This is what made them so powerful inside the oligarch structure of the west. Their solidarity with each other and their ideals is stronger than that of the rest due to that extra level of fanaticism.

    That brings me to the second aspect of Starikov’s analysis that I think is off. He doesn’t mention the ZPC side of the oligarchy at all, but reduces the aggressor to just the USA. But if one looks at the people who betray Russia for the west (5th element), they are mostly equally or more connected to Israel as they are the USA. When they are busted, they as often flee to Israel as to the USA or Europe. The ZPC oligarchy is as strong in Europe and the Anglo ex-colonies as it is in the USA. That is they have complete veto power in the policy decision making process.

    The same is true in the Ukraine, where the leadership is practically a who’s who of the local assets of the Jewish mafia. This was also true of the Georgian regime of tie eater, which had as strong direct ties to Israel, as it had to the USA.

    вот так

    [ThatJ: What a naughty goy!]

    http://twitter.com/ArmedResearch/status/568175259553271808

    • kat kan says:

      They have not finished finding it all yet. And “captured” implies working ones, how many more fixable? This is serious rearmament for NAF.

      • Pavlo Svolochenko says:

        I wonder what kinds of MBTs? Has Ukraine ever deployed any T-84s to the battlefield?

        • kat kan says:

          They only owned 10 of them to start with. Supposedly they were used early in the piece. I’ve not seen one in reb hands, so can’t say what happened to them. Certainly wouldn’t be any left by now, one way or another.

  19. Warren says:

    Somewhat biased but interesting documentary on the Winter War 1939/40, not that I am excusing USSR aggression, However the absence of a Soviet/Russian input and perspective on the war was a little disappointing.

    • kirill says:

      Finland was an ally of Nazi Germany. So we are talking the policy of genocide against most of the people of the USSR. The whole Finland as victim in this story is a load of BS. They got this war because of their own policies.

      It’s actually a lesson for today. Don’t expect Russia to roll over for western hyenas who plan to break it apart and do essentially what Hitler planned.

      • Moscow Exile says:

        Siege of Leningrad.

        How many civilians died?

        Who besieged the city?

        Funny how Finland never gets a mention in this heroic exploit.

      • Warren says:

        Was Finland an “ally” of Nazi Germany in in 1939/40? What treaty did Finland sign with Nazi Germany, I don’t recall every reading about such a treaty or alliance.

        The primary objective of the USSR’s attack on Finland, was to protect Leningrad by extending the Finnish border further north.

      • Finland was not formally a German ally in 1939 but the overall mood in Finland was very pro-German then. But Finland did fight pretty much alone in the Winter War without German help. Since the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact put Finland into Soviet sphere the Germans did not interfere.

        • Moscow Exile says:

          And the Finnish army besieged Leningrad together with the German army – or were the Finns acting independently?

          Finnish President Ryti was strongly against taking direct military action against the city.He made it clear that Finnish war-planes should not bomb Leningrad, and they did not. Finnish artillery did not bombard the city as well.

          Accordingly, no Finnish soldiers or politicians were charged with taking part in the of siege of Leningrad.

          Nevertheless, the northern land route to Leningrad through the West Karelian isthmus was blocked by the Finns, which must have surely been as big a contributory factor towards the starvation of Leningraders as was the Nazi bombing and bombardment of the city: by blocking a supply route to the city, the Finns were just as guilty of committing a huge war crime against a civilian population as were the Germans.

          • Moscow Exile says:

            Finland was never de jure an ally of Nazi Germany, but it was a companion of Germany from the beginning of Operation Barbarossa, 1941, to separate peace with the Soviet Union in 1944.

            Why was Finland exonerated of any guilt of perpetrating a war crime against the civilian population during the siege of Leningrad, in which four times more people died than did as a result of the atom-bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima?

            And a war crime the siege most certainly was.

            The Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 upheld the traditional view that an army may legally block food or other relief shipments into a besieged city if the aid resulted in more goods becoming available to the local military forces. But Article 54 of the First Additional Protocol contains an absolute ban on the starvation of civilians as well as forbidding the destruction of foodstuffs, crops, livestock and drinking water supplies that a civilian population relies on for sustenance. This provision may require a besieging force to allow relief supplies to enter a besieged city, even if some of the supplies will inevitably be shared with the defenders. A besieging army is also forbidden, for example, from destroying a city’s drinking water supply.

            It seems however, that the prosecution of war crimes does not take precedence over political exigencies: no mention, for example, of war crimes as regards the Ukraine government cutting off water and electricity to the Crimea.

            There are some (e.g. Secretary of State Kerry) who believe that access to energy is also a human right.

            • Warren says:

              Finland were de facto allies of Nazi Germany during the the Continuation War 1941-44 and siege of Leningrad. Finland received German arms for its war against against the Soviets.

    • Moscow Exile says:

      Many Finns go to Tallinn to get pissed as handcarts – something at which many of them seem pretty adept.

      • Warren says:

        The beer is cheaper in Tallinn than in Helsinki I suppose.

      • Warren says:

        Prior to watching that video, I was unaware the extent of Russian influence on the design and construction of modern Helsinki. The neoclassical architecture and grand boulevards of Helsinki is very similar to that of St Petersburg. It also interesting to note that the statute of Tsar Alexander II still remains in Senate square Helsinki, obviously the Finns still appreciate and acknowledge Tsar Alexander II benevolence.

        • Pavlo Svolochenko says:

          While hating his country and people and working endlessly for their destruction.

          It is the Russians’ own fault really. Only a fool thinks that a snake won’t bite him because he rescued it from the highway.

        • Moscow Exile says:

          Before Western film companies were allowed to shoot films in Russia, Helsinki was often used as a replacement Moscow: they just changed the signs to Cyrillic.

          “Gorky Park” was shot in Finland. The first western film shot in post-1917 Russia was “The Russia House”, which made me laugh when I saw here on TV because in it they had amazingly impossible juxtapositioning of scenes, such as this one, shown when the hero, played by Sean Connery, has just walked the length of Red Square:

          whereupon Connery walks down towards the river and turns right, and there facing him is this scene:

          which is the Lavra of The Trinity and St.Sergii of Radonezh, situated some 75 kms away and northeast of Moscow.

          • PaulR says:

            You can enjoy similar bizarre scenes watching Inspector Morse. He will enter a passageway in Merton and come out two seconds later in Trinity; not quite as large a leap as Moscow to Sergeev Posad, to be sure, but impressive nonetheless.

          • Jen says:

            I saw “Gorky Park” ages ago and though I don’t remember the plot and vaguely remember seeing James Coburn, I definitely remember seeing this yellow building in a couple of short scenes near the start and the end:

            It’s known as Government Palace and houses the Prime Minister’s office, the Ministry of Finance and the office of the Chancellor of Justice (Finnish equivalent of Attorney General). It’s not to be confused with the Presidential Palace in Helsinki which looks superficially similar:

            If you know the architectural styles of classical Greek architecture, the tops of the columns of Government Palace are in Corinthian style and those of the Presidential Palace are in Ionian style.
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_order

            Just to confuse the hell out of you all even more with yellow Finnish public buildings in 19th-century Neoclassical style, here is the University of Helsinki (main building):

            Come to think of it, the unviersity building might have been the one featured in the film. I’m not sure that the Finnish govt of the day would have allowed filming of its own buildings in a movie set in the Soviet Union in case the KGB saw it and got ideas of its own. Maybe even Lord Sauron has seen the film and now has fantasies about recovering Finland for the Empire of Mordor.

  20. Warren says:

    Putin will target the Baltic next, Defence Secretary warns

    Defence Secretary warns Nato resolve could be tested as Ukraine ceasefire unravels

    There is a “real and present danger” that Vladimir Putin will launch a campaign of undercover attacks to destabilise the Baltic states on Nato’s eastern flank, the Defence Secretary has warned.
    Michael Fallon said the Russian president may try to test Nato’s resolve with the same Kremlin-backed subversion used in Crimea and eastern Ukraine.

    A murky campaign of infiltration, propaganda, undercover forces and cyber attack such as that used in the early stages of the Ukraine conflict could be used to inflame ethnic tensions in Estonia, Lithuania or Latvia, he said.

    The military alliance must be prepared to repel Russian aggression “whatever form it takes”, Mr Fallon said, as he warned that tensions between the two were “warming up”.

    The Defence Secretary spoke as Ukrainian troops pulled out of the besieged town of Debaltseve yesterday after it was stormed by pro-Russian rebels.

    The retreat was a severe defeat for Ukrainian troops, who had been encircled in the strategically important town by rebel forces since last week. The European Union called it a “clear violation” of the Minsk peace plan.

    Mr Fallon said the latest negotiations to forge peace in Ukraine look similar to earlier doomed efforts. Talks in Minsk, Belarus, last week had failed to see Russia hand over control of the border.

    David Cameron said that if Russia does not stop destabilising Ukraine then Europe must make it clear that Moscow faces economic sanctions for “many years to come”.

    The Prime Minister said Europe could not “turn a blind eye” to events in Ukraine, where he said “effectively one country is challenging the territorial integrity of another country”.

    “Those Russian-backed rebels in eastern Ukraine, they are using Russian rocket launchers, Russian tanks, Russian artillery, you can’t buy this equipment on eBay, it hasn’t come from somewhere else, it’s come from Russia and we know that,” he said.

    The former Soviet states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia could be next to face a Russian-backed campaign to destabilise them, Mr Fallon warned.

    The number of Russian military flights probing Baltic airspace has trebled in the past year, according to Nato. Estonia says that one of its security service officers was kidnapped on the border last year and is being held in Russia.

    Many defence analysts have questioned whether Nato’s eastern members could cope with a covert campaign similar to that used in Ukraine last year — such as irregular troops, cyber attack and skilful propaganda being used to exploit internal tensions with ethnic Russian minorities.

    Mr Fallon said: “It’s a very real and present danger. He was testing Nato all last year, if you look at the number of flights and the maritime activity.

    “He flew two Russian bombers down the English Channel two weeks ago. We had to scramble jets very quickly to see them off. It’s the first time since the height of the Cold War, it’s the first time that’s happened.

    “That just shows you, you need to respond, each time he [Mr Putin] does something like that, you need to be ready to respond.”

    A sharp increase in Russian defence spending is “clearly worrying”, he added.
    “They are modernising their conventional forces, they are modernising their nuclear forces and they are testing Nato, so we need to respond.”

    He went on: “There are lots of worries. I’m worried about Putin. There’s no effective control of the border, I’m worried about his pressure on the Baltics, the way he is testing Nato, the submarines and aircraft.”

    Asked if the world was facing a new Cold War, he said “It is warming up, you have tanks and armour rolling across the Ukrainian border and you have an Estonian border guard who has been captured and not yet still returned.”

    Britain has so far refused to arm the Ukrainian government.

    Mr Fallon said: “We are supplying non-lethal equipment. At the moment, our view is that lethal would escalate the conflict, but we will continue to keep that under review.”

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/vladimir-putin/11421751/Putin-will-target-the-Baltic-next-Defence-Secretary-warns.html

    • marknesop says:

      Testing NATO by flying in international airspace? Does flying in international airspace now require NATO’s permission?

      They have nothing to lose by suggesting they could keep the sanctions up for years, because the Russia-western trade relationship is dead anyway.

      • kat kan says:

        Why don’t these other countries RETALIATE by flying up and down the English Channel themselves? That’ll show them damn Russkis.

      • Warren says:

        Cameron is bluffing and deluding himself if he thinks the EU will maintain these sanctions against Russia for years to come. Many EU states, especially those of the “periphery” e.g. Greece, Cyprus, Spain. And “core” EU states such as Italy and France have expressed their reservations on sanctioning Russia. The EU sanctions have to be renewed every 6 months, the renewal has be to unanimously approved by all EU member states.

        Russian military planes flying in proximity to any NATO state irrespective of the fact such a plane is flying in international air space is predictably deemed as “provocative, hostile and aggressive” by the Western media. Are only NATO military planes allowed to fly in international air space? https://widgets.wp.com/notifications/1687115959#

    • Warren says:

      RAF jets scrambled after Russian aircraft seen off Cornwall

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31530840

  21. ThatJ says:

    My post was deleted, that’s why it appears like you’re talking with yourself.

    Where Jeb is from doesn’t matter, to be honest. He could be from Connecticut and it wouldn’t make a difference.

    No discussion of the heavyweights funding the potential next president or where their interests lie. When McCarthy attacked “communism”, he avoided mentioning the elephant in the room, hoping that the subversion would go away… this half a century ago. Look where the US is headed today.

    • ThatJ says:

      This comment was supposed to be a reply to James.

      He replied to a comment I wrote, which was deleted. So his reply lost the context and was understandably also deleted.

      • marknesop says:

        And you know why. We are not going to stealthily move around to another hammer-and-tongs battle on race relations and the Jews, with their oily fingers in everything, manipulating global affairs. Furthermore, rants on Muslim immigration which refer to them as “Mueslis” are also unwelcome. You are perfectly capable of holding your own in a conversation which stays on the subject, and frequently introduce welcome topics for discussion. Stick to that, and we’ll have no problems.

        • james says:

          thatj and mark. thanks. got it.. it is a long conversation better left somewhere else.. thatj – ever spent any time at mondoweiss? it imagine it would be an interesting experience for you..

      • ThatJ says:

        @Mark

        …rants on Muslim immigration which refer to them as “Mueslis”

        That’s what I like about it, the humor! He uses it everywhere in his weekly summary.

        The French are not spared, either:

        FROGGIES WARNED

        Though, in the aftermath of Charlie Hebdo [the singalong for which had done wonders for previously unpopular socialist president M.Hollande], the French had poured scores of thousands of extra cops and squaddies on to their streets, their efforts were not enough to prevent police cars being fired on by Kalashnikov in the Muesli district of Castellane, in the south of Marseilles.

        As the madness deepened, a French-speaking photojournalist called Cantlie [though apparently sporting British citizenship] appeared with other jihadists in a film for ISIS urging French Mueslis to undertake ‘lone wolf’ attacks on passing Frogs.

        Cantlie may have been speaking under duress, but was shown sitting in a Sharia court, where he compared the system’s “remarkably simple” laws with “the laws of democratic countries which change to fit every circumstance or to fit every different week” (Independent, 10 iii).

        Nor are the Germans:

        GERMANS ABJURE CHURCHILLIANISM

        Visiting Westminster to address parliamentarians and have tea with the Queen, Mrs Angela Merkel, ‘the Queen of Europe’ showed that her fleets of civil servants were no more up to it than was she herself. Appearing as a sack of potatoes with a pudding-basin haircut, in an ill-fitting jacket and a muddled-up ‘necklace’ from Woolworths, the Reichskanzlerein told no anecdotes or jokes, used no quotations and did not refer to any particular people (not even mentioning PM ‘Call Me Dave’), her half-hour speech going off without a flicker of emotion and without anything but polite indifference and attempts to stay awake from the assembled worthies.

        Nothing less Churchillian in level of inspiration could be imagined, raising big questions about whether even the highest-level Krauts were capable of running Europe. The German Empire’s one big achievement, the pudgy dumpling stressed, was to have made the EUSSR unchangeable – by the expedient of requiring unanimity of voting among the 28 members, an arrangement last tried in C18 Poland and resulting in parliamentary paralysis and the final division of the country between Russia and Prussia. {Oh for a talk from Europe’s naughty gerontocrat, Italy’s Silvio Berlusconi!}

        WHAT ANGELS WE ARE!

        Continuing his effort to be the Eysenck de nos jours, psycholinguist Steven Pinker, who had embraced evolutionism, hereditarianism and even a little racism (Jewish superiority – he himself being, like Eysenck and Jensen, part-Jewish), tried to balance his ticket by putting out the optimistic message (first advanced by Norbert Elias in 1976) that humankind was actually becoming less violent (The Better Angels of Our Nature: the Decline of Violence in History and its Causes, Allen Lane, x 2011 – Guardian, 22 ix)

        What? WWI, Stalin, WWII, Holocaust, Korea, Mao, Pol Pot, Iraq vs Iran, Chechnya, Rwanda/Burundi, Darfur (Sudan), Congo, the ‘Arab Spring’ (60 dying daily in Syria, Yemen and Libya), and with Iran vs Israel due any moment? Of course, it was great that the French had stopped fighting the Germans (and ourselves: we had whacked the Froggies for 600 years till the Krauts finished the job rather too convincingly in 1870, madly raising our sympathy for the underdog) – but the E.U. and eurozone were by 2011 on the verge of break-up (along McDougallian lines – q.v.).

        Nationalism and socialism, those two great causes of war, had certainly been suppressed by boomtown globalization – but would make a comeback as (miseducated, propagandized) youngsters realized how their futures had been stolen by Labour-loved banksters and super-greedy ‘civil servants.’ The world’s major contests had been suppressed by the happy advent of nuclear weapons (which made serious warfare pointless) – but this standoff was being undermined by the arrival of positively suicidal Mueslis armed with nukes.

        And the happy reduction of conflict by ethnic territorialisation (into the non-White cities of Los Angeles, Atlanta, Bradford etc.) would not long survive economic recession and the serious scaling down of the welfare state – as pointed out in The g Factor.

        Indeed, the infiltration of the West by mad Mueslis and drug-dealing Hispanics would soon yield the violence that Enoch Powell once predicted – at least if the West’s feminasties, yags, transgendered, uglies and kindred disabled decided to put up a fight….

        Could it be that Pinker had never clapped eyes on an ethnic problem – or even that he lived graciously in Harvard?… {At the level of individual violence, my own impression is that the massive improvements in surveillance [urged by me in New Society, 1971] and policing technology had just about kept pace with the increased criminality due to irreligiosity, divorce and, above all, cheap drink.}

        As Pinker’s volume began to turn the presses, the whole world saw with amazement the Tottenham (etc.) riots pitting Black youth against police; UK media went understandably ballistic over video footage of 8-yr-old boys egged on to break each other’s spines during ‘cage fighting’ bouts in Preston; and from Sydney came news of vicious mass fighting between 14-yr-girls seeking to prove themselves for initiation into prestigious male gangs (Daily Mail, 24 ix)…. Leftist Barcelona did ban bullfighting – but probably this was so as to concentrate on its more popular sport of mugging tourists….

        …Jews, with their oily fingers in everything, manipulating global affairs

        Regarding Jewish Zionists in the State Dept and the various neocon networks, they are real and they influence foreign policy more than any other demographic group, the Iraq War being the most glaring example. In a fight between Biden, McCain and other “Anglos” vs the Zionists, who do you think would prevail? Who would be tossed aside?

        There are some sane voices in the US government, some of whom are also Jews who I think act out of self-preservation. They punch well above their weight.

        If they exerted influence on a non-entity, like, say, the Czech Republic, then their power would not translate into “global affairs”. But, considering the countries of their influence are the UK and the US, then I’m afraid to say that their foreign policies are pretty much “global affairs”.

        • marknesop says:

          Yes, the Zionists are real and they are enormously influential. Everyone knows that. But it’s astonishing how every cautious acceptance of that premise leads to a flood of commentary from The Occidental Observer about the Jews in general, and how they control the film industry and this industry and that industry and are constantly agitating for the betterment of Jews over every other ethnicity. If I wanted to write a blog about race relations and racism and the preservation of the white race against the constant assaults of the Jews, I would. I don’t. I am sure there are plenty of such blogs for those who are interested.

          I do not see anything amusing about articles which refer to Muslims as Mueslis, or those that refer to blacks as niggers or those which refer to whites as honky motherfuckers. In my opinion, such conversations lack dignity and depth even as they hammer on a favourite theme while other readers roll their eyes and sigh “here we go again”. That’s why I am politely asking you to abstain from such discussions here. For the second time.

        • Jen says:

          Keep going, ThatJ, keep going … nearly there …

          (I’m praying hard, Yalensis!)

  22. ThatJ says:

    Poroshenko speaks about the glorious withdrawal of UA troops from Debaltsevo:

    Internal stability will not be undermined by the battalions “everything is lost” and “this is the end”, lies about a lot of soldiers murdered yesterday, encircled roadblocks and Ukrainian warriors without ammunition, food and water. It is not a Ukrainian scenario. I am confident that those who were spreading it expected a different result. Fortunately, we successfully completed the operation and will have an opportunity to further defend the state.

    He sounds confrontational here. Clearly, he’s picking a fight with the battalions, calling their commanders “liars”.

    Full statement: http://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/32292.html (in English)

    • marknesop says:

      I see. So the real mission of the glorious state forces was to show the true character of the pro-Russia separatists, by allowing themselves to be surrounded and pounded for days by artillery fire. Well, then; complete success. Jolly well done, chaps. The pretense to idiocy and tactical ineptitude, considering it already happened once at Ilovaisk, was masterful, really bloody brilliant – I was completely taken in.

      Seriously; is the Ukrainian public buying this “I meant to do that” Pee-Wee Hermanizing of a catastrophic defeat? It reminds me of the Iraqi government’s “There are no American tanks in Baghdad” spectacular denial of reality. How stupid does he think people are?

      Oh, and it’s always a good idea to make enemies of your military leaders. There is actually nothing keeping Poroshenko in power except the will of the west that he remain leader.

      • ThatJ says:

        At least some people have a sense of humor:

        Technically speaking .. as of 12:00 GMT, Poroshenko is correct – there is no cauldron.

        • marknesop says:

          Yes, that’s funny. I’d like to see that sort of mockery spread to the greater part of the Ukrainian population. But that’s not very likely so long as the west backs his draconian lawmaking which makes any such expressions of mockery punishable by imprisonment. Quite the beacon of freedom they’re building there.

  23. ThatJ says:

    US Sends “Tankbuster” Jets To Europe Over Russia Fears After Germany Says “A Large Scale War Could Develop”

    Karl-Georg Wellmann, a lawmaker in Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union has warned that, despite its efforts to avoid arms being provided to Ukraine, Germany “will no longer be able to stop weapons deliveries from from the U.S. and Canada.” Almost too coincidental to these comments, CNN reports, the U.S. Air Force is sending its A-10 “tankbusters” back to Europe in order to “increase rotational presence in Europe to reassure our allies and partner nations that our commitment to European security is a priority.” As Wellmann ominously concludes, seemingly confirming Putin’s warning yesterday that if Kiev aims at a military solution, war will never end, “a large-scale war could develop out of that.”

    Full text: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-18/us-sends-tankbuster-jets-europe-over-russia-fears-after-germany-says-large-scale-war

    • marknesop says:

      Russia would be well-advised in future to keep its thoughts to itself and to simply demonstrate, through military exercises, that any enemy which comes against it will pay a terrible cost. Because its comments about what might lead to war are like a shopping list to the USA, who urgently desires a land war in Europe which will leave the continent devastated and broken, and itself untouched, so that it can start at Bretton Woods all over again and use American can-do to rebuild the world for fun and profit and the continued comfort and prosperity of Americans. Europe is too weak to stop it.

  24. Pingback: RUSSIA & UKRAINE: JRL 2015-#31 table of contents with links :: Wednesday 18 February 2015 | Johnson's Russia List

  25. ucgsblog says:

    Nice one Mark! There’s also the matter of kitchen gardens and dacha gardens. My sources in Russia are complaining mostly about currency swaps, (for those who took out loans in different currencies and those who do business in them,) and variable interest rates on loans. Food simply isn’t on the agenda, although if I was at the head of the Kremlin, I’d allow all people who owe less than 7 million Rubles to refinance variable interest rate to low fixed loan free of charge, if they’re working, which isn’t a problem in Russia. Hungry Russia is a myth, been that way since 1945. But haters are going to hate.

    • marknesop says:

      Thanks, UCG! The restructuring of loans is a good idea – why don’t you propose it in an email on the Prime Minister’s website? I’m sure they will take good advice under consideration from anyone.

    • Moscow Exile says:

      Yes, we have jars and jars of jams and preserves here from our dacha the year round. I was only the other day eating some jam that had been prepared 2 years ago (it has all been devoured now by my children): like good wine, it seems to mature with age.

      My wife does all of this. She does not do it because of impoverishment: she does it because that’s what Russians do. We also gather mushrooms and wild berries in the forest.

      Bollocks to McDonald’s!

      🙂

      • james says:

        we do something similar here too.. i opened some crab-apple jalapeno jelly i had made from 3 years ago just the other day! the wild berries around here are blackberries and we do gather them, along with blueberries off the bushes we have.. we have 3 hazel nut trees too and a number of fruit trees.. paradise i tell ya!

      • kat kan says:

        Jam and pickles sound incredibly hard and time consuming, reading (usually silly) recipes for how to do it. Done regularly, they’re no harder than any other cooking. Before commercial ones were readily available (and much looked down on) even city people made their own: peasants would drive huge cartloads of the ingredient around, and people would buy big baskets full. Tomatoes, gherkins, apricots, plums, quinces.

        gggrrr made myself hungry now. Even the imported powidl is nothing like homemade.

  26. ThatJ says:

    What Putin Learned From Reagan

    By Stephen M. Walt

    Russia’s power play for Ukraine takes a page out of the Gipper’s playbook. We should have seen it coming.

    There was a great power that was worried about its longtime rival’s efforts to undermine it. Its leaders thought the rival power was stronger and trying to throw its weight around all over the world. In fact, this longtime rival was now interfering in places the declining state had long regarded as its own backyard. To protect this traditional sphere of influence, the worried great power had long maintained one-sided relationships with its neighbors, many of them led by corrupt and brutal oligarchs who stayed in power because they were subservient to the powerful neighbor’s whims.

    But suddenly, a popular uprising toppled the corrupt leader of one of those client states, and he promptly fled the country. The leaders of the uprising seemed eager to align with the great power’s distant rival, in part because they admired the rival’s ideology and wanted to distance themselves from the neighbor that had long dominated their much-weaker country. In response, the tough-minded conservative leader of the now very worried great power ordered his government to arm rebel groups in the former client state, to prevent the new government from realigning and eventually to drive it from power.

    Full text: http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/02/17/what-putin-learned-from-reagan-ukraine-nicaragua/

    • marknesop says:

      Why does he keep saying “What Putin and Russia are doing is reprehensible”? If Canada launched a military assault against the province of Quebec, upon being told the French would no longer obey the direction of the Ottawa government shortly after that government announced the suspension of French as an official language, and the government’s military drove the French into an enclave with their backs to the river just across from Augusta and began to pound them with artillery, and some Americans said hell, that ain’t right, and crossed the river to fight alongside the French to prevent their wholesale murder – would the reaction of the world be “What Obama and the Americans are doing is reprehensible”? What is the alternative? Stand aside, and let the Kiev butchers have their way? If that passes for reasonable in this world, Walt, go fuck yourself sideways with a wire brush.

      • james says:

        good analogy mark.. that is how i see it too, which leads me to appreciate the wisdom in random humour that moscow exile shares down below..

    • Moscow Exile says:

      I should imagine the only thing that Putin has learnt from Reagan is never to watch a movie in which he stars.

      He wasn’t the star in “Bedtime for Bonzo”, by the way.

  27. davidt says:

    Joaquin Flores has a subtle interpretation of the Minsk negotiations, and the myriad of nuances in the agreement. In accordance with the KISS principle (is this a universal principle? KISS:=”keep it simple, stupid”) I’ll just draw attention to one claim that he makes. He claims that the Merkel and company were very concerned that there were Europeans, citizens of NATO countries, inside the Debaltsevo cauldron, and that they were worried that some would be captured. I wonder whether there is some factual basis to this. Their worry was that if such people were paraded by the separatists then the narrative would change from a “Russian invasion” to a “NATO invasion”, or something similar. It is noteworthy that Putin dropped the comment that NATO was already arming Kiev at his press conference in Hungary a few days ago.
    http://fortruss.blogspot.ca/2015/02/the-beautiful-truth-about-minsk-ii.html
    I must admit that I think that Walt is drawing a long bow when his compares Reagan’s actions in Nicaragua with Putin’s in Ukraine. I suppose he is writing for a different audience.

    • kat kan says:

      NAF have shown a very small number of NATO gear (helmets, night vision etc) which are legit defensive items, a few times claimed to have found Polish passports, once a Polish vehicle licence plate.

      But they were claiming many 100s of foreigners in Debaltsevo, based on radio traffic they heard. Either these all escaped or all died — or some got captured. I am not expecting them to do any parading of such captives (or corpses) precisely because of “….narrative would change from a “Russian invasion” to a “NATO invasion” …” Nobody needs this change right now. I’d expect them to get the evidence and keep it up their sleeve, a card trick they are fast learning from Putin.

      Zakharchenko said in one talk “we are a young republic. We have things to learn. At Minsk we learned diplomacy”. Fast learners.

      • et al says:

        Yes, curious is it not? I have little doubt that foreigners have been caught but for whatever reasons, they have not had their Warhol 15 minutes of fame. I can imagine all sorts of complication of such exposure so I guess it really comes down to, what is the effect you wish to achieve?

        Yes, it would prove that NATO/NATO states are directly involved to the western public but the western public is not driving western foreign policy, but does have an effect on it, i.e. they all say that they have had enough of foreign adventures. It is not as if there is a strong anti-war movement, by which I mean large ‘Fk the US’ demonstrations in multiple european capitals every Sunday. Jobs not war….

  28. peter says:

  29. peter says:

    • kat kan says:

      Peter do you read the articles the tweets lead to? or you just put them here as teasers?

      In this case, how long does it take to build a reactor? 6 to 9 years and they’re not all immediate starts. A lot of components will be made in Russia so the money goes straight back into their other pocket. Just half of current budget surpluses would cover that paltry $88 billion over 10 years.

      • Peter has a point. Russian nuclear industry is taking giving loans for building NPP’s instead of demanding hard currency as a payment. Is that wise?

        • kat kan says:

          They have 6 or so years to see if the buyer isn’t good with his payments. They don’t have to continue. Also after a few months they need more fuel, and if the power suddenly goes off the voters will be unhappy, so….. it is only Ukraine that happily doesn’t pay the heating bills.

          Anyway with this time payment system, the buyer is under a lot less financial pressure, so better chance of making the payments. But because it is vendor finance, no banks are involved to take a commission-for-nothing out of it. The is then not a loan they can package up as an investment and run a futures market ponzi scheme on it.

  30. peter says:

    • kat kan says:

      Oh dear. Peter’s found something else Russia can’t afford.

      “.. violations of Art. 337 (absence without leave) of the Criminal Code has increased by 60%: 388 cases in the first half of 2013 and 629 cases of “AWOL” in the first half of 2014. Serious leap occurred in the statistics of art. 339 (evasion of military service obligations by simulating illness, or otherwise), this figure has tripled: 33 in the first half of 2013 and 115 for the first half of 2014. In this case, for the entire 2013 were recorded 96 such cases.
      TRIPLED what a shock, the headline understated it. Tripled from 33 to 115…. out of 154,000 men called up. They are seriously running out of soldiers.

      Maybe they can contract some of the 1.2 million Ukrainians who escaped their own draft by running to Russia.

      • Drutten says:

        Worth noting is that a fairly decent amount of last year’s AWOLers actually left service to fight as volunteers in Ukraine. This has been corroborated by numerous military sources in both Russia and among the Ukrainian rebels (and by some AWOLers themselves) and Russia is a bit indecisive about what to do about it even though they’re formally regarded as wanted. Curious case, that.

        …Also, regarding Ukrainian draft dodgers and deserters… Russia already has contracted large numbers of them. For instance: approximately 6,000 Ukrainian marine soldiers defected to the Russian military in Crimea and are now serving the RF. They’re in turn wanted by Kiev:
        http://112.ua/obshchestvo/sostavlen-spisok-iz-6-tys-moryakov-vms-ukrainy-pereshedshih-na-sluzhbu-v-rf-192347.html

        They alone make up for it. 😉 And there were many more large-scale defections there from other branches of the Ukrainian military.

        Now… Regarding the draft evaders in Russia last year… 115 is a suprisingly low number actually, approximately 0.07%. The corresponding average percentage in Sweden was around 0.3% over the last decade we had of compulsory conscription.

        …And now Sweden has a much smaller all-volunteer army, with the whole draft system only remaining as part of wartime protocol. Russia is moving towards a 50/50 solution nowadays, with an ever-increasing part volunteers (ie contracted “professional” soldiers). Since last year, contracted volunteers are in fact in majority.

      • james says:

        don’t pay attention to the details – just swallow the headline whole hog and ”’fear for russia”! this is the whole exercise of peters.. actually i would pray for peter more then russia given this silly past time of his!

      • marknesop says:

        Oooooo….Peter, I think you have met your match in Scary Tweetland.

  31. peter says:

    • marknesop says:

      And no particular need to develop them at this time considering the cost of development would probably exceed the profit realized from the sale of oil. Wow; Russians can add and subtract! Who knew?

  32. peter says:

  33. peter says:

    • kat kan says:

      Thank you Peter, that is about enough for today. Do you have any thoughts of your own you’d be willing to share?

      • james says:

        apparently not!! his mind is like a hollow echo chamber that reverberates with ambitions of becoming the wests special foreign propaganda minister and to one day replace the refrigerator man at ft or something..

    • marknesop says:

      Is the Wall Street Journal a very reliable source on Russia, do you think? I mean, it’s the same paper that produces, every couple of years, another “report” which says the Russian population is in a death spiral downward and the best and brightest are fleeing to the west. And what do they mean by “real wages”? Do they mean people are actually taking a cut in wages paid to them, or that their buying power is less? If the latter, whoopty-doo. Join the club.

      • peter says:

        Is the Wall Street Journal a very reliable source on Russia, do you think?

        No idea, I don’t read it very often. I do however know this particular author: he was, for instance, the only one to correctly predict the outcome of the latest Navalny trial.

        And what do they mean by “real wages”?

        Nominal wages adjusted for inflation.

      • Jen says:

        “Real wages” refer to the actual buying power of your wages so they are equivalent to what Peter has said (nominal wages adjusted for inflation). If what you can buy now is less than what you bought before with the same amount of money then inflation has occurred even if the prices have not changed over time.

  34. et al says:

    It’s Victor Meldrew time.

    The Groaning Man: Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands by Richard Sakwa review – an unrivalled account
    http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/feb/19/frontline-ukraine-crisis-in-borderlands-richard-sakwa-review-account

    At last, a balanced assessment of the Ukrainian conflict – the problems go far beyond Vladimir Putin

    When Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Ukraine’s prime minister, told a German TV station recently that the Soviet Union invaded Germany, was this just blind ignorance? Or a kind of perverted wishful thinking? If the USSR really was the aggressor in 1941, it would suit Yatsenyuk’s narrative of current geopolitics in which Russia is once again the only side that merits blame.

    When Grzegorz Schetyna, Poland’s deputy foreign minister, said Ukrainians liberated Auschwitz, did he not know that the Red Army was a multinational force in which Ukrainians certainly played a role but the bulk of the troops were Russian? Or was he looking for a new way to provoke the Kremlin?

    Faced with these irresponsible distortions, and they are replicated in a hundred other prejudiced comments about Russian behaviour from western politicians as well as their eastern European colleagues, it is a relief to find a book on the Ukrainian conflict that is cool, balanced, and well sourced. Richard Sakwa makes repeated criticisms of Russian tactics and strategy, but he avoids lazy Putin-bashing and locates the origins of the Ukrainian conflict in a quarter-century of mistakes since the cold war ended. In his view, three long-simmering crises have boiled over to produce the violence that is engulfing eastern Ukraine. The first is the tension between two different models of Ukrainian statehood. One is what he calls the “monist” view, which asserts that the country is an autochthonous cultural and political unity and that the challenge of independence since 1991 has been to strengthen the Ukrainian language, repudiate the tsarist and Soviet imperial legacies, reduce the political weight of Russian-speakers and move the country away from Russia towards “Europe”. The alternative “pluralist” view emphasises the different historical and cultural experiences of Ukraine’s various regions and argues that building a modern democratic post-Soviet Ukrainian state is not just a matter of good governance and rule of law at the centre. It also requires an acceptance of bilingualism, mutual tolerance of different traditions, and devolution of power to the regions….
    ###

    A lot more at the link. I guess it is one of those things that once you’ve been in the system for long enough and you get out, you become more outspoken about its failings. It also explains why Jonothan Steele is perfectly happy to take part in RT’s Cross Talk.

    Meanwhile, the UK Defense Secretary is braying over the Russian threat to the Balts after getting free handjobs from Porkoshenko and the Baltic Band of Bigoted Brothers (B4), not to mention the old Pansir meme now on UKMinDef NATO twitter feed * which is now proof via Janes (lol!), Bellend Cat (how’s the Syria chemical weapons search going boyz?), & ARES (Armed Research Services). Talk about scraping the barrel!

    * http://www.themoscowtimes.com/business/article/britain-says-photos-show-russia-s-most-advanced-missiles-in-eastern-ukraine/516196.html

    • et al says:

      There is one clear military reason Pansir S1 systems might be needed though. Kiev has the habit of firing Точка-U ballistic missiles to the total silence of the western human rights enterprises. Still, only one system? What’s the point of that???

      • kat kan says:

        Have you seen the range on those? the only place worth hitting with Tochka-U is Donetsk. One Pansir can cover that. (though nobody said they don’t have another). A few days ago they knocked down 2 Tochka-Us in fairly close succession, they never said what with.

        • marknesop says:

          I could see that happening. After all, the west is plainly not going to offer a word of censure, simply parrot that old “President Poroshenko has a right to protect his country”. They don’t explain how firing ballistic missiles – plainly not an aimed weapon – into civilian population centres is “protecting one’s country” in the case of a civil war, and in fact would not be allowed to do it against an enemy under international law. But if the west is going to suspend international law for the duration of the Ukrainian conflict, then I could see Russia slipping the rebels a little something to nullify their terror weapons.

  35. peter says:

    • marknesop says:

      You mean the CSIS directed by Andrew Kuchins, co-author with Anders Aslund and Servei Guriev of “Russia After the Global Economic Crisis”? Russia is delaying “critical reforms” because of the “resource curse”?

  36. peter says:

    • patient observer says:

      Peter, Peter, Peter, more rubbish. One third of the Russian population is approximately 50 million. The Russian work force is approximately 76 million. So 66% of Russian workers expect to lose their jobs or have a wage cut? The writer probably meant 1/3 of the work force and not all Russians,

      But wait, there’s more!
      “…more than a third of all Russians expect cutbacks where they work, as well as wage losses and delays in getting their paychecks”. See, “cutbacks where they work” but not necessarily themselves. For example, an enterprise has 1,000 workers and rumors are circulating that 25 workers will be laid off. Per the poll, 1,000 people would answer that they expect cutbacks where they work even though the affected group is a few percent.

      I suspect that a similar figure would be true for the US if the question were phrased per the above. I would imagine in states like Texas and Louisiana the survey results would show close to 100%.

      Give us an anti-Russian story that is a little more challenging Peter!

  37. et al says:

    Chelsea fans don’t let black man get on Paris metro:

    Normally I wouldn’t bother posting such things except that Chelsea fan and erstwhile comedian David Baddiel and his brother launched a hypocritical campaign a few years ago against Tottenham Hotspur fans (who call themselves the “Yid Army”) and are fiercely proud of the club and its roots (not that there is much jewish left about it), to ban who their chants “Yiddo Yiddo” etc. , even though when Chelsea plays Tottenham, it is the Chelsea fans that make hissing noises alluding to the gas chambers (mostly a football windup but probably not for some).

    And here again we see Chelsea supporter behaving themselves. But the hypocrite Chelsea fan Baddiel brothers save their ire for Tottenham!

    I posted about this before, and here’s a classic reply letter from a Tottenham fan.

    A letter from a Jewish Tottenham fan to David Baddiel
    http://threeandin.com/a-letter-from-a-jewish-tottenham-fan-to-david-baddiel/

    Dear David

    Here we are again. The Y word. Or to refer to its real name, The C Word. Because as you and I both know this little problem is not about Spurs fans using the word Yid in a positive or negative manner. It’s about feeling uncomfortable at Chelsea games.

    I can appreciate where you are coming from. As a Jewish Tottenham fan myself, going to Stamford Bridge is an incredibly difficult day out for me. I’m 37 and I look like a typical NW London Jew. You and I would pick each other out as Jews from 100 yards at any holiday destination on Earth.

    I even have a brilliant Jewish hooter to top off the look. I am what I am. Getting off the tube at Fulham Broadway though, I might as well have that yellow star sewn to my coat, because you are quite right this is not what football is about. Its a quite vile experience and as a father of two boys, one that I wont be putting them through until they are a lot older, if at all. To be honest though, this is your problem and not mine.

    We turned an insult into a positive. All on our own. The gay community did it with the word queer. Its quite clever really. Quite why you suggest that those who turned the insult into a term of fraternity should lead the way, so those that use it as a racial insult can be told not to use it, is quite frankly illogical.

    Chelsea, West Ham, Leeds. These are the three places where I have heard the gassing noises and felt that pang of nausea in my stomach. A pang you describe and which I’m sure you feel somewhat ashamed about. Be that as it may, Tottenham on a match day is probably the safest environment in England for a Jewish person. Isn’t that lovely? My family have 4 tickets and we are reform Jews. However I often give any spares to two ultra orthodox Spurs fans.

    They both wear kippot and one of them looks like every rabbi you’ve ever seen in your Haggadah. They get cheered through the streets of Tottenham. They love it! People smile at them, chant Yiddo at them and they wear their spurs shirts and their tzitzit with pride.

    How wonderful is that? In an era where there is so much bitterness and negativity, these two fellas can enjoy their football and their religion and feel totally safe. Thirty years ago that might have not been the case as the bananas hailed down on black wingers and coins were thrown at Jews to see if they would pick them up.

    David, I am a huge fan of your work, but in this you are so wide of the mark that I find your view offensive. I find what you are trying to do, actually borderline anti-Semetic. Don’t hide away the victims and shut them up because it makes your match day experience difficult. This is Chelsea’s problem. This is West Hams problem. This is Leeds United’s problem.

    In Germany in 1933, SS men stood outside Jewish shops to deter anyone from entering. In 1934, buses, trains and park benches had seats marked out for us to sit on and our children were taught specifically anti-Semetic ideas. In 1935 the Nuremberg Law was passed and Jews lost their rights to be German citizens and marriage between Jews and non-Jews became illegal. You know how this story ends.

    In 2013 Jews and non Jews in a small corner of London, are united. Please please please, don’t poppycock that up.

  38. kat kan says:

    Kiev has decided to comply with the improved humanitarian access provisions of the Minsk agreement by shutting off all the gas to Donbass.

    http://sputniknews.com/business/20150219/1018464810.html

    To make sure the engineers can’t put it back on again, “… It was done in a barbaric way – valves of the main pipeline were dismantled so that their re-switching has become impossible,” – engineer-in-chief Vadim Tupoi said.”..”

    http://lug-info.com/news/one/zapasov-gaza-v-lnr-i-dnr-khvatit-lish-do-vechera-upravlenie-magistralnykh-gazoprovodov-1678

    I can’t work out how they can spin this to make it Putin’s fault.

    • marknesop says:

      If they can’t, then they will ignore it. President Poroshenko, after all, has a right to protect his country.

      President Poroshenko could reach into a barrel of vaginas and come up with a penis. He just cannot do anything right, he could fuck up the national anthem. I hope the U.S. State Department – and whatever Call-me-Dave’s equivalent is – are all collectively grinding their teeth at the ridiculous embarrassments they have to keep justifying in the name of tilting the table so the Ukrainian state can win. Putin must be spent from laughing. I know I would be. It’s like a war choreographed by Monty Python.

  39. Moscow Exile says:

    What Reagan taught Putin:

    • Moscow Exile says:

      Bollocks! What happened?

      • Jen says:

        Were you expecting a Lazarus-style performance? Now that would be amazing acting.

        • Moscow Exile says:

          Nay, I posted what I thought was his Empire of Evil speech that he made to a load of Baptists at a convention in Orlando, Florida, but up came this full life and times of the Gipper from his “foundation”.

          Hopefully, here it is – Ronnie at his best:

    • marknesop says:

      There’s something to be said for making an actor president, though. No teleprompters then, and he delivers that entire mellifluous speech with barely a pause, apparently off the cuff and referring to notes only for a direct quotation. Reagan was hard to dislike, even if he was the iconic Republican conservative who inspired all those latter-day wuzzocks who came after. And at least Russia knew where it stood with him, and with America. Pretty much everything between then and now has been a big waste of time in terms of U.S.-Russia relations.

  40. et Al says:

    A follow up (or should that be a follow down?) I’ve just come across on Russia-direct.org to the piece by Jonathan Steele for the Guardian about Sawka’s new book ‘Crisis sin the Borderlands’.

    Russia-Direct.org: The Ukraine crisis has become more dangerous than just a new Cold War
    http://www.russia-direct.org/qa/ukraine-crisis-has-become-more-dangerous-just-new-cold-war

    RD Exclusive: Russia Direct sat down with eminent Russia scholar Richard Sakwa of the University of Kent to discuss his new book Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands and to analyze the geopolitical challenges ahead in 2015.

    With no end in sight for the Ukrainian crisis in 2015, leading academics are beginning to offer their insights on how to address this geopolitical standoff. Among them is Richard Sakwa, professor of Russian and European politics at the University of Kent. His new book Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands provides an explanation of the origins of the crisis in Ukraine and tracks down the circumstances that provoked the intense confrontation between Russia and the West, which has been described by some experts as a new Cold War.

    “The asymmetrical end of the Cold War effectively shut Russia out from the European alliance system,” Sakwa said. “The failure to establish a genuinely inclusive and equal European security system imbued European international politics with powerful stress points, which in 2014 produced the international earthquake that we call the Ukraine crisis.”

    He sees this crisis as “the worst international crisis in Europe since the end of the Cold War.” As Sakwa sees it, the current crisis has called into question the idea of a Greater Europe, or a way of bringing together all ends of the European continent into a new grouping that Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev once called the Common European Home. According to Sakwa, the crisis is a major challenge to a multipolar and pluralistic concept of Europe.

    Russia Direct conducted a Skype interview with Sakwa to find out about the major ideas of his book and how they can be applied to minimize the current tensions in relations between Russia, Europe and – more broadly – with the West. In addition, Sakwa talked about the U.S.-Russia geopolitical face-off, the current economic crisis in Russia and its implications for the rest of the world. …
    ####

    Read the interview at the link Ladies!

    • Moscow Exile says:

      ‘Crisis in the Borderlands’!!!!

      That should be “Borderlands”!

      No article!

      Names of countries do not have articles!

      That’s the rule!

      Are you trying to say that Borderlands is not a real country?

      Bogdan Zhopachenko,
      Toronto

      • Pavlo Svolochenko says:

        Bohdan(using ‘g’ instead of ‘h’ is Stalinism! Mend your ways!) has right idea. Use of articles is aggression against Ukraine. Prosecute author as material sponsor of terrorism.

        Pavlo Svolochenko.
        Pokyd’ok, Saskatchewan

    • et Al says:

      5 comments in 11+ hours. Doesn’t that strike anyone as a bit odd? Then, on investigation, it is a book review and clearly one that The Groaning Man doesn’t want to advertise. Remember kids Censorship is Free when you are a biogted liberal!

      • et Al says:

        I just remembered CiF is a cleaning product:

        That explains a lot. The Guardian is the nanny newspaper. It actively protects you from any views that it thinks you shouldn’t be exposed to! A bit Stalinist (or Enver Hoxaist) isn’t it?

  41. ThatJ says:

    Poroshenko announces agreements with the EU if fighting and shelling continue

    President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko has said he has reached agreement with the leadership of the European Union regarding a prompt response to further violations of the Minsk agreement regarding the ceasefire in the Donbas and the withdrawal of heavy weapons.

    http://www.unian.info/politics/1046223-poroshenko-announces-agreements-with-the-eu-if-fighting-and-shelling-continue.html

    Ukrainian army killed Debaltsevo citizens in their homes with headshots before retreating:

    Shelling resumed in Donetsk city center. Is the ceasefire breaking down? The UA army lost in Debaltsevo, so I guess it’s time to punish the civilians for your failure.

    American Humvee captured by the rebels in Debaltsevo:

    Zakharchenko estimates 3,000 – 3,500 junta loyalists died in cauldron.

    Poroshenko: As aggressor Russia cannot and will not participate in the peacekeeping mission in Ukraine.

    France should recognize Crimea as part of Russia – Le Pen

    The leader of the French National Front Party, Marine Le Pen has urged the French government to recognize Crimea as part of Russia’s territory and to restore ties with Moscow, a “natural ally of Europe.”

    There is no alternative, but to recognize the legality of Crimea’s ascension into the Russian Federation, Le Pen told the Polish Do Rzeczy in an interview. The French politician says that Paris must accept Crimea’s choice, as it became part of Russia in the time of lawlessness following an orchestrated “coup” last year, when “Neo-Nazi militants organized a revolution in Ukraine.”

    Le Pen says the Peninsula had no other choice as “power in Kiev was illegal,” at that time. “The authorities [in Kiev] started to make decisions that would lead to civil war,” she added.

    The leader of the French National Front emphasized that “Russia is a natural ally of Europe.”

    “We are pawns in the game of influence between the United States and Russia. Russia is a great country, a great people, with which Europe has many common strategic interests. We need to talk with Russia,” she said.

    Full text: http://rt.com/news/232919-france-le-pen-crimea-russia/

    • kat kan says:

      Still no confirmed reliable source for the head shots in homes story. May be based on isolated incident.

    • marknesop says:

      “The situation becomes even more acute, because after signing the Minsk agreements, the militants, supported by the Russian Federation and with the participation of regular Russian army, actually destroyed Debaltseve, wiping it off the face of the earth – today Debaltseve resembles a lunar landscape,” Poroshenko said.”

      Semyonovka, near Slaviansk.

      The french government will attempt to attack le Pen for her pro-Russian statements with remarks like “It looks like the Kremlin is getting good value for its money”. But this is a calculated gamble on her part, to go ahead with pro-Russian rhetoric after the announcement that her party received a loan from a Russian bank. It will be interesting to see where her popularity ratings go in the next few weeks – it will give us a read on the opinion of the French electorate vis-a-vis Russia.

  42. Warren says:

    Ukraine crisis: Russia’s ‘surprise’ at Michael Fallon comments

    1 hour ago

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-31542375

  43. astabada says:

    No more funding for Greece.

    It’s not the Ukraine.

Leave a comment